The GROW Model is a structured coaching framework that divides conversations into four phases: Goal, Reality, Options, and Will (action plan). Developed in the 1980s by Sir John Whitmore, it is today one of the most widely used coaching methods in the world. HR professionals and managers apply it particularly in employee development conversations, one-on-ones, and performance reviews.
What Is the GROW Model?
The GROW Model is a coaching framework that structures conversations between managers and employees into four clearly defined phases. The name is an acronym: Goal, Reality, Options, and Will – representing the four steps from goal-setting to a concrete action plan.
The model was developed in the 1980s by British business consultant Sir John Whitmore, who described and popularised it in his seminal work Coaching for Performance (first published in 1992). Whitmore collaborated closely with Graham Alexander and Alan Fine. The model is built on the principle that people develop their best solutions themselves – when supported by the right questions. The role of the coach or manager is therefore not to provide answers, but to use targeted questions to spark reflection and development.
The GROW Model is deliberately straightforward and does not require any formal coaching qualification. This makes it directly applicable for managers and HR professionals – in both formal development conversations and brief, informal coaching moments in day-to-day work.
The 4 Phases of the GROW Model in Detail
G – Goal: Defining the Objective
The first phase establishes the focus of the conversation. The aim is to jointly clarify what the person wants to achieve – whether by the end of the session or over the medium to long term. This is not limited to professional goals; personal development objectives and specific challenges are equally valid.
Crucially, the goal should be articulated by the person themselves – not dictated by the manager. Only then does genuine motivation and commitment emerge.
Typical questions in the Goal phase:
- What do you want to achieve through this conversation?
- What does success look like for you in six months?
- What matters most to you on this topic?
- How will you know when you have reached your goal?
R – Reality: Honestly Assessing the Current Situation
The second phase involves taking a clear-eyed, unvarnished look at the present state of affairs. What is the actual situation? Which factors are influencing it? What has the person already tried – and what has or hasn't worked?
This phase is critical to the success of the conversation: only someone who truly understands the starting point can develop meaningful options. For managers, this means showing genuine interest and listening actively – not evaluating or jumping prematurely to solutions.
Objective data can also provide a solid foundation for this phase. Companies that use scientifically grounded competency assessments give both employees and managers a shared, neutral basis for discussion – one that goes beyond subjective impressions. The digital platform Aivy enables exactly this: drawing on validated psychometric methods developed in collaboration with Freie Universität Berlin, it generates objective strengths and competency profiles that can serve as a starting point for the Reality phase of a GROW conversation.
Typical questions in the Reality phase:
- How would you describe the current situation?
- What is already working well – and what is not?
- What have you tried so far?
- Which factors are within your control?
O – Options: Developing Possibilities
In the third phase, the person – guided by questions – generates as many options as possible for reaching their goal. This phase thrives on openness and creativity: the aim is not to find the "right" solution immediately, but to first broaden the solution space.
The manager may contribute their own ideas at this stage, but should do so with care so as not to steer the person in a particular direction. The majority of options should come from the person themselves.
Typical questions in the Options phase:
- What are the possible ways to reach this goal?
- What would you do if there were no constraints?
- What has worked in similar situations in the past?
- Which option seems most promising to you – and why?
W – Will / Way Forward: Establishing the Action Plan
The fourth phase translates the outcomes of the conversation into concrete, binding next steps. Who does what by when? What support is needed? How will progress be measured?
This phase is decisive for implementation: without a clear action plan, a development conversation remains nothing more than a good intention. The person should leave with specific next steps they have committed to themselves.
Typical questions in the Will phase:
- What will you do as your next concrete step?
- By when do you want to have this done?
- What support do you need to make it happen?
- How will you know you are on the right track?
The GROW Model in an HR Context – When It Works Best
Employee Conversations and Development Dialogues
The GROW Model is particularly well suited to structured employee development conversations that go beyond pure performance appraisal and focus on genuine growth. The four phases help keep the conversation on track and actively involve employees – rather than simply cascading feedback from top to bottom.
Performance Reviews
The model also provides a valuable structure for performance reviews: the Goal phase defines objectives for the coming period, the Reality phase enables an honest reflection on the period just passed, the Options phase generates development measures, and the Will phase produces concrete agreements.
Onboarding Coaching
New employees also benefit from the GROW framework: managers can use it early on to clarify individual goals, align expectations, and identify areas where support is needed. This strengthens the onboarding experience and promotes long-term retention.
Strengths-Based Leadership and Team Analysis
Some organisations use the GROW Model as a framework for strengths-based leadership conversations: when employees are aware of their own strengths and competencies, it becomes easier for them to set realistic goals and identify fitting development paths.
GROW Model vs. Other Methods
GROW vs. SMART
SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound) is not a coaching framework – it is a method for defining goals. The two approaches are not mutually exclusive; in fact, SMART is an ideal complement to the Goal phase of the GROW Model. Formulating a SMART goal in the first phase gives the entire conversation a sharper direction.
GROW vs. OKR
OKR (Objectives and Key Results) is a strategic goal-setting framework used primarily at the organisational and team level. The GROW Model, by contrast, is a conversational framework for individual coaching situations. Both can be used in parallel: OKR defines the overarching goals, while GROW supports the development of employees on the path to achieving them.
Tips for Managers – How to Make the GROW Conversation Work
1. Ask questions instead of providing answers: The biggest challenge for managers is holding back solutions and leading through questions instead. A coaching mindset is learnable – but it takes practice.
2. Listen actively: This means more than staying silent: show genuine interest, summarise what has been said, and ask follow-up questions when something is unclear. Employees notice whether a conversation is authentic.
3. Allow enough time: An effective GROW conversation needs space – typically 45 to 90 minutes for a full development discussion, and at least 20 to 30 minutes for a focused GROW check-in.
4. Don't skip the phases: The Reality phase in particular tends to be cut short in everyday conversations. Jumping too quickly to Options risks coaching past the actual situation.
5. Create commitment: The conversation is only truly complete once concrete next steps have been agreed upon. Record them in writing and schedule a follow-up.
Frequently Asked Questions about the GROW Model
What does the GROW acronym stand for?
GROW stands for the four phases of the coaching framework: Goal, Reality, Options, and Will (or Way Forward). Each phase addresses a different aspect of the development conversation – from defining the objective to committing to a concrete action plan.
Who developed the GROW Model?
The GROW Model was developed in the 1980s by Sir John Whitmore, a British business consultant and coaching pioneer, in collaboration with Graham Alexander and Alan Fine. Whitmore first described it in his book Coaching for Performance (1992, Nicholas Brealey Publishing), which remains a standard reference in coaching literature to this day.
Do I need to be a qualified coach to use the GROW Model as a manager?
No. The GROW Model is deliberately simple and accessible. A certified coaching qualification is not required to apply it in everyday management. What is recommended, however, is internalising the fundamental coaching mindset – asking questions rather than giving answers – and practising the model first in a leadership training setting or lower-stakes conversations.
How long does a GROW conversation take?
It depends on the goal and context. Full development conversations typically last between 45 and 90 minutes. For shorter coaching impulses during the working day – for example, to reflect on a specific problem – 20 to 30 minutes can be sufficient. More important than the duration is a genuine coaching stance: active listening and sincere interest.
What is the difference between the GROW Model and SMART?
SMART is a method for precise goal formulation (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound). The GROW Model, on the other hand, is a conversational framework for the entire coaching process. The two approaches complement each other well: SMART helps to formulate a clearly defined goal during the Goal phase of the GROW conversation.
For which situations is the GROW Model not suitable?
The GROW Model is not an instrument for deep personal crises, mental health conditions, or conflicts that require professional psychological support. It is also not appropriate when clear directives are necessary – for example, in the event of acute safety issues or legal requirements. In such cases, different forms of conversation or external professionals are needed.
Conclusion
The GROW Model is one of the most proven coaching frameworks available to HR professionals and managers. Its strength lies in its simplicity: the four phases of Goal, Reality, Options, and Will give any development conversation a clear structure – without requiring a formal coaching qualification.
The model becomes particularly effective when the Reality phase is grounded in a solid, objective foundation. Managers and employees who can draw on validated competency and strengths data together have more focused and candid development conversations. The digital platform Aivy offers scientifically grounded assessments for exactly this purpose – generating objective competency profiles based on psychometrically validated methods, providing a neutral foundation for individual development dialogues.
Learn more about objective competency analysis as a basis for development conversations: Discover the Aivy Platform.
Sources
- Whitmore, J. (2009). Coaching for Performance: The Principles and Practice of Coaching and Leadership (4th ed.). Nicholas Brealey Publishing. https://www.nicholasbrealey.com/9781473658127/
- Grant, A. M. (2012). An integrated model of goal-focused coaching: An evidence-based framework for teaching and practice. International Coaching Psychology Review, 7(2), 146–165. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285898019
- International Coaching Federation (ICF). (2023). Global Coaching Study 2023. https://coachingfederation.org/research/global-coaching-study
- Berg, I. K. & Szabo, P. (2005). Brief Coaching for Lasting Solutions. W. W. Norton & Company.
- Deutsche Gesellschaft für Personalführung (DGFP). (2022). Praxispapier: Führung und Coaching [Practical Guide: Leadership and Coaching]. https://www.dgfp.de/
Make a better pre-selection — even before the first interview
In just a few minutes, Aivy shows you which candidates really fit the role. Beyond resumes based on strengths.




















