You want to explore your strengths as a talent?

This way

Login

SMART Goals – Definition, Method & Examples for HR

Home
-
Lexicon
-
SMART Goals – Definition, Method & Examples for HR

SMART goals are a proven method for goal formulation where each goal must meet five criteria: Specific, Measurable, Achievable (or Attractive), Relevant (or Realistic), and Time-bound. The method was developed in 1981 by George T. Doran and helps HR professionals create goal agreements that are clear, traceable, and verifiable.

What Are SMART Goals? – Definition

SMART goals are a structured method for formulating goals in a way that makes them unambiguous, verifiable, and achievable. The term "SMART" is an acronym – a word formed from the initial letters of five criteria that a well-formulated goal should meet.

In the HR context, SMART goals are primarily used in goal agreements between managers and employees. They form the basis for performance reviews, bonus systems, and employee development. The advantage: both the manager and the employee know exactly what is expected and when a goal is considered achieved.

What Does SMART Stand For? – The 5 Criteria Explained

The acronym SMART stands for five characteristics that every goal should have. Depending on the source, there are slight variations in the meaning of individual letters – but the core idea remains the same.

S – Specific

A goal must be clearly and unambiguously formulated. Vague phrases like "achieve better results" or "increase sales" are not sufficient. Instead, the goal should specifically describe what exactly is to be achieved.

Helpful W-questions: What exactly should be achieved? Who is involved? Where does it take place? Why is it important?

M – Measurable

Only what is measurable can be verified. A measurable goal contains quantifiable criteria – for example, numbers, percentages, or specific key performance indicators (KPIs). This allows for an objective determination of whether and to what degree the goal was achieved.

A – Achievable (or Attractive/Accepted)

The "A" is interpreted differently: as "achievable," "attractive," or "accepted." The core message: the goal should be motivating for the person concerned. Goals that are dictated from above and have no personal relevance are less likely to be achieved.

R – Relevant (or Realistic)

A goal must be achievable with the available resources, skills, and timeframe. Unrealistic goals lead to frustration and demotivation. At the same time, the goal should be relevant – meaning it should align with the company's overarching strategy.

T – Time-bound

Every goal needs a clear timeframe with a deadline. Without a deadline, there is no pressure to implement, and goals are postponed indefinitely. A clear deadline helps with prioritization and prevents procrastination.

Origin of the SMART Method

The SMART formula was first described in 1981 by George T. Doran in his article "There's a S.M.A.R.T. way to write management's goals and objectives" in Management Review. Doran developed the method as a practical answer to the problem of vague and hard-to-measure corporate goals.

The scientific foundation was provided by Edwin A. Locke and Gary P. Latham with their "Goal Setting Theory" (1990). Their research showed that specific, challenging goals lead to better performance than vague or overly simple goals. The SMART method builds on these findings.

The concept of "Management by Objectives" (MbO) by Peter Drucker from the 1950s is considered a precursor. MbO laid the foundation for goal-oriented leadership – SMART specified how these goals should be formulated.

How to Formulate SMART Goals – Step by Step

Here's how to formulate a SMART goal in five steps:

  1. Make it concrete (Specific): Describe precisely what is to be achieved. Avoid vague terms like "improve" or "increase" without further specification.
  2. Define metrics (Measurable): Determine the criteria by which you will measure success. These can be numbers, percentages, or qualitative criteria.
  3. Ensure acceptance (Achievable): Make sure all stakeholders support the goal. In job interviews or employee meetings, goals should be agreed upon together.
  4. Check feasibility (Relevant): Verify whether the goal is achievable with the available resources and capabilities. Also consider external factors.
  5. Set a deadline (Time-bound): Define a specific timeframe with an end date. For longer-term goals, milestones help with interim monitoring.

SMART Goals Examples for HR

The following examples show what SMART goals can look like in the HR field:

Recruiting Goal

Not SMART: "We want to hire faster."

SMART: "Time-to-hire for IT positions will be reduced by 20% – from an average of 45 to 36 days – by the end of Q3 2026."

Onboarding Goal

Not SMART: "Onboarding should be better."

SMART: "New employee satisfaction with the onboarding process will be increased to at least 85%, measured through a standardized feedback survey after 90 days. Target date: December 31, 2026."

Employee Retention Goal

Not SMART: "Fewer employees should quit."

SMART: "Voluntary turnover in the sales team will be reduced from 18% to below 12% within the next 12 months, supported by a new development program and regular stay interviews."

Advantages and Limitations of the SMART Method

Advantages

The SMART method offers several benefits for goal setting in HR:

  • Clarity: All parties know exactly what is expected
  • Measurability: Goal achievement can be objectively assessed
  • Fairness: Performance evaluations are based on transparent criteria
  • Motivation: Realistic, time-bound goals promote drive
  • Resource efficiency: Time and resources are used purposefully
  • Easy application: The method is quickly learned and universally applicable

Criticism and Limitations

Despite its widespread use, the SMART method also has limitations:

  • Limiting innovation: The focus on "achievable" goals can lead to insufficiently ambitious goals
  • Not everything is measurable: Qualitative goals like culture change or improved collaboration are difficult to quantify
  • Rigid goal pursuit: In dynamic environments, strict goal adherence can be counterproductive
  • Short-term focus: The time-bound nature can neglect long-term, strategic goals

SMART vs. OKR – What's the Difference?

In addition to SMART, the OKR method (Objectives and Key Results) has established itself in recent years, especially in agile companies. The key differences:

Criterion SMART OKR
Focus Individual goals Framework with Objectives + Key Results
Ambition level 100% achievement targeted 70% achievement considered success
Time horizon Flexible (usually annual) Quarterly
Transparency Often only between manager and employee Visible company-wide
Philosophy Realistic planning "Stretch goals" desired

Both methods can be combined: OKR for strategic alignment, SMART for the concrete formulation of Key Results.

Frequently Asked Questions About SMART Goals

What are SMART goals?

SMART goals are a method for clear goal formulation. Each goal must meet five criteria: Specific (concrete), Measurable (quantifiable), Achievable (motivating), Relevant (realistic), and Time-bound (with a deadline). The method prevents vague or unrealistic goal setting.

What does the acronym SMART stand for?

S = Specific (clear and unambiguous), M = Measurable (verifiable with metrics), A = Achievable or Accepted (motivating for those involved), R = Relevant or Realistic (attainable and meaningful), T = Time-bound (with a clear deadline).

How do you formulate a SMART goal correctly?

Describe specifically what is to be achieved (S), define measurable success criteria (M), ensure the goal is motivating (A), check achievability with available resources (R), and set a clear timeframe with a deadline (T).

What is an example of a SMART goal in HR?

A SMART recruiting goal: "Time-to-hire for IT positions will be reduced by 20% – from 45 to 36 days – by the end of Q3 2026." It is specific (IT positions), measurable (20%, 36 days), achievable, relevant, and time-bound (Q3 2026).

What is the difference between SMART and OKR?

SMART is a method for formulating individual goals with 5 criteria. OKR (Objectives and Key Results) is a framework with overarching objectives and measurable key results. OKR encourages more ambitious "stretch goals," while SMART focuses on 100% achievable goals.

What are the advantages of SMART goals?

The main advantages are: clarity and unambiguity, objective measurability, higher motivation through realistic goals, better resource planning, and a fair basis for performance evaluations.

Is there criticism of the SMART method?

Yes. Critics point out that the focus on "achievable" can lead to insufficiently ambitious goals. Additionally, not all goals are easily measurable (e.g., culture change), and rigid goal pursuit can be hindering in dynamic environments.

How often should SMART goals be reviewed?

Regular check-ins are recommended – monthly or quarterly. This allows for discussing interim progress and adjusting goals when circumstances change. At year-end, a final evaluation of goal achievement takes place.

Conclusion

SMART goals offer HR professionals and managers a simple yet effective method for creating goal agreements that are clear and verifiable. The five criteria – Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound – ensure that goals don't remain vague but become concretely actionable.

Especially in HR, where topics like talent relationship management and employee development are becoming increasingly important, SMART goals create transparency and fairness. They are not a cure-all, but a solid foundation for professional goal setting.

Would you like to set measurable recruiting goals and make your selection process more objective? Discover how scientifically validated aptitude diagnostics can help: Learn more about Aivy

Sources

  • Doran, G. T. (1981): "There's a S.M.A.R.T. way to write management's goals and objectives." Management Review, Vol. 70, Issue 11, pp. 35-36.
  • Locke, E. A. & Latham, G. P. (1990): "A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance." Prentice Hall.
  • German Federal Administration Handbook (2024): SMART Rule / SMART Method. https://www.orghandbuch.de
  • Drucker, P. F. (1954): "The Practice of Management." Harper & Brothers. [Foundation for Management by Objectives]
  • Personio HR Lexicon (2024): SMART Objectives. https://www.personio.com/hr-lexicon/smart-objectives/
Home
-
lexicon
-
SMART Goals – Definition, Method & Examples for HR

SMART goals are a proven method for goal formulation where each goal must meet five criteria: Specific, Measurable, Achievable (or Attractive), Relevant (or Realistic), and Time-bound. The method was developed in 1981 by George T. Doran and helps HR professionals create goal agreements that are clear, traceable, and verifiable.

What Are SMART Goals? – Definition

SMART goals are a structured method for formulating goals in a way that makes them unambiguous, verifiable, and achievable. The term "SMART" is an acronym – a word formed from the initial letters of five criteria that a well-formulated goal should meet.

In the HR context, SMART goals are primarily used in goal agreements between managers and employees. They form the basis for performance reviews, bonus systems, and employee development. The advantage: both the manager and the employee know exactly what is expected and when a goal is considered achieved.

What Does SMART Stand For? – The 5 Criteria Explained

The acronym SMART stands for five characteristics that every goal should have. Depending on the source, there are slight variations in the meaning of individual letters – but the core idea remains the same.

S – Specific

A goal must be clearly and unambiguously formulated. Vague phrases like "achieve better results" or "increase sales" are not sufficient. Instead, the goal should specifically describe what exactly is to be achieved.

Helpful W-questions: What exactly should be achieved? Who is involved? Where does it take place? Why is it important?

M – Measurable

Only what is measurable can be verified. A measurable goal contains quantifiable criteria – for example, numbers, percentages, or specific key performance indicators (KPIs). This allows for an objective determination of whether and to what degree the goal was achieved.

A – Achievable (or Attractive/Accepted)

The "A" is interpreted differently: as "achievable," "attractive," or "accepted." The core message: the goal should be motivating for the person concerned. Goals that are dictated from above and have no personal relevance are less likely to be achieved.

R – Relevant (or Realistic)

A goal must be achievable with the available resources, skills, and timeframe. Unrealistic goals lead to frustration and demotivation. At the same time, the goal should be relevant – meaning it should align with the company's overarching strategy.

T – Time-bound

Every goal needs a clear timeframe with a deadline. Without a deadline, there is no pressure to implement, and goals are postponed indefinitely. A clear deadline helps with prioritization and prevents procrastination.

Origin of the SMART Method

The SMART formula was first described in 1981 by George T. Doran in his article "There's a S.M.A.R.T. way to write management's goals and objectives" in Management Review. Doran developed the method as a practical answer to the problem of vague and hard-to-measure corporate goals.

The scientific foundation was provided by Edwin A. Locke and Gary P. Latham with their "Goal Setting Theory" (1990). Their research showed that specific, challenging goals lead to better performance than vague or overly simple goals. The SMART method builds on these findings.

The concept of "Management by Objectives" (MbO) by Peter Drucker from the 1950s is considered a precursor. MbO laid the foundation for goal-oriented leadership – SMART specified how these goals should be formulated.

How to Formulate SMART Goals – Step by Step

Here's how to formulate a SMART goal in five steps:

  1. Make it concrete (Specific): Describe precisely what is to be achieved. Avoid vague terms like "improve" or "increase" without further specification.
  2. Define metrics (Measurable): Determine the criteria by which you will measure success. These can be numbers, percentages, or qualitative criteria.
  3. Ensure acceptance (Achievable): Make sure all stakeholders support the goal. In job interviews or employee meetings, goals should be agreed upon together.
  4. Check feasibility (Relevant): Verify whether the goal is achievable with the available resources and capabilities. Also consider external factors.
  5. Set a deadline (Time-bound): Define a specific timeframe with an end date. For longer-term goals, milestones help with interim monitoring.

SMART Goals Examples for HR

The following examples show what SMART goals can look like in the HR field:

Recruiting Goal

Not SMART: "We want to hire faster."

SMART: "Time-to-hire for IT positions will be reduced by 20% – from an average of 45 to 36 days – by the end of Q3 2026."

Onboarding Goal

Not SMART: "Onboarding should be better."

SMART: "New employee satisfaction with the onboarding process will be increased to at least 85%, measured through a standardized feedback survey after 90 days. Target date: December 31, 2026."

Employee Retention Goal

Not SMART: "Fewer employees should quit."

SMART: "Voluntary turnover in the sales team will be reduced from 18% to below 12% within the next 12 months, supported by a new development program and regular stay interviews."

Advantages and Limitations of the SMART Method

Advantages

The SMART method offers several benefits for goal setting in HR:

  • Clarity: All parties know exactly what is expected
  • Measurability: Goal achievement can be objectively assessed
  • Fairness: Performance evaluations are based on transparent criteria
  • Motivation: Realistic, time-bound goals promote drive
  • Resource efficiency: Time and resources are used purposefully
  • Easy application: The method is quickly learned and universally applicable

Criticism and Limitations

Despite its widespread use, the SMART method also has limitations:

  • Limiting innovation: The focus on "achievable" goals can lead to insufficiently ambitious goals
  • Not everything is measurable: Qualitative goals like culture change or improved collaboration are difficult to quantify
  • Rigid goal pursuit: In dynamic environments, strict goal adherence can be counterproductive
  • Short-term focus: The time-bound nature can neglect long-term, strategic goals

SMART vs. OKR – What's the Difference?

In addition to SMART, the OKR method (Objectives and Key Results) has established itself in recent years, especially in agile companies. The key differences:

Criterion SMART OKR
Focus Individual goals Framework with Objectives + Key Results
Ambition level 100% achievement targeted 70% achievement considered success
Time horizon Flexible (usually annual) Quarterly
Transparency Often only between manager and employee Visible company-wide
Philosophy Realistic planning "Stretch goals" desired

Both methods can be combined: OKR for strategic alignment, SMART for the concrete formulation of Key Results.

Frequently Asked Questions About SMART Goals

What are SMART goals?

SMART goals are a method for clear goal formulation. Each goal must meet five criteria: Specific (concrete), Measurable (quantifiable), Achievable (motivating), Relevant (realistic), and Time-bound (with a deadline). The method prevents vague or unrealistic goal setting.

What does the acronym SMART stand for?

S = Specific (clear and unambiguous), M = Measurable (verifiable with metrics), A = Achievable or Accepted (motivating for those involved), R = Relevant or Realistic (attainable and meaningful), T = Time-bound (with a clear deadline).

How do you formulate a SMART goal correctly?

Describe specifically what is to be achieved (S), define measurable success criteria (M), ensure the goal is motivating (A), check achievability with available resources (R), and set a clear timeframe with a deadline (T).

What is an example of a SMART goal in HR?

A SMART recruiting goal: "Time-to-hire for IT positions will be reduced by 20% – from 45 to 36 days – by the end of Q3 2026." It is specific (IT positions), measurable (20%, 36 days), achievable, relevant, and time-bound (Q3 2026).

What is the difference between SMART and OKR?

SMART is a method for formulating individual goals with 5 criteria. OKR (Objectives and Key Results) is a framework with overarching objectives and measurable key results. OKR encourages more ambitious "stretch goals," while SMART focuses on 100% achievable goals.

What are the advantages of SMART goals?

The main advantages are: clarity and unambiguity, objective measurability, higher motivation through realistic goals, better resource planning, and a fair basis for performance evaluations.

Is there criticism of the SMART method?

Yes. Critics point out that the focus on "achievable" can lead to insufficiently ambitious goals. Additionally, not all goals are easily measurable (e.g., culture change), and rigid goal pursuit can be hindering in dynamic environments.

How often should SMART goals be reviewed?

Regular check-ins are recommended – monthly or quarterly. This allows for discussing interim progress and adjusting goals when circumstances change. At year-end, a final evaluation of goal achievement takes place.

Conclusion

SMART goals offer HR professionals and managers a simple yet effective method for creating goal agreements that are clear and verifiable. The five criteria – Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound – ensure that goals don't remain vague but become concretely actionable.

Especially in HR, where topics like talent relationship management and employee development are becoming increasingly important, SMART goals create transparency and fairness. They are not a cure-all, but a solid foundation for professional goal setting.

Would you like to set measurable recruiting goals and make your selection process more objective? Discover how scientifically validated aptitude diagnostics can help: Learn more about Aivy

Sources

  • Doran, G. T. (1981): "There's a S.M.A.R.T. way to write management's goals and objectives." Management Review, Vol. 70, Issue 11, pp. 35-36.
  • Locke, E. A. & Latham, G. P. (1990): "A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance." Prentice Hall.
  • German Federal Administration Handbook (2024): SMART Rule / SMART Method. https://www.orghandbuch.de
  • Drucker, P. F. (1954): "The Practice of Management." Harper & Brothers. [Foundation for Management by Objectives]
  • Personio HR Lexicon (2024): SMART Objectives. https://www.personio.com/hr-lexicon/smart-objectives/

Heading 1

Heading 2

Heading 3

Heading 4

Heading 5
Heading 6

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut laboratories et dolore magna aliqua. Ut Enim ad Minim Veniam, Quis Nostrud Exercitation Ullamco Laboris Nisi ut Aliquip ex ea Commodo Consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderite in voluptate velit eat cillum dolore eu fugiate nulla pariature.

Block quote

Ordered list

  1. Item 1
  2. Item 2
  3. Item 3

Unordered list

  • Item A
  • Item B
  • Item C

Text link

Bold text

Emphasis

Superscript

Subscript

Heading 1

Heading 2

Heading 3

Heading 4

Heading 5
Heading 6

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut laboratories et dolore magna aliqua. Ut Enim ad Minim Veniam, Quis Nostrud Exercitation Ullamco Laboris Nisi ut Aliquip ex ea Commodo Consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderite in voluptate velit eat cillum dolore eu fugiate nulla pariature.

Block quote

Ordered list

  1. Item 1
  2. Item 2
  3. Item 3

Unordered list

  • Item A
  • Item B
  • Item C

Text link

Bold text

Emphasis

Superscript

Subscript

Florian Dyballa

CEO, Co-Founder

About Florian

  • Founder & CEO of Aivy — develops innovative ways of personnel diagnostics and is one of the top 10 HR tech founders in Germany (business punk)
  • More than 500,000 digital aptitude tests successfully used by more than 100 companies such as Lufthansa, Würth and Hermes
  • Three times honored with the HR Innovation Award and regularly featured in leading business media (WirtschaftsWoche, Handelsblatt and FAZ)
  • As a business psychologist and digital expert, combines well-founded tests with AI for fair opportunities in personnel selection
  • Shares expertise as a sought-after thought leader in the HR tech industry — in podcasts, media, and at key industry events
  • Actively shapes the future of the working world — by combining science and technology for better and fairer personnel decisions
success stories

You can expect these results

Discover what successes other companies are achieving by using Aivy. Be inspired and do the same as they do.

Many innovative employers already rely on Aivy

Say that #HeRoes

“Through the very high response rate Persuade and retain We our trainees early in the application process. ”

Tamara Molitor
Training manager at Würth
Tamara Molitor

“That Strengths profile reflects 1:1 our experience in a personal conversation. ”

Wolfgang Böhm
Training manager at DIEHL
Wolfgang Böhm Portrait

“Through objective criteria, we promote equal opportunities and Diversity in recruiting. ”

Marie-Jo Goldmann
Head of HR at Nucao
Marie Jo Goldmann Portrait

Aivy is the bestWhat I've come across so far in the German diagnostics start-up sector. ”

Carl-Christoph Fellinger
Strategic Talent Acquisition at Beiersdorf
Christoph Feillinger Portrait

“Selection process which Make fun. ”

Anna Miels
Learning & Development Manager at apoproject
Anna Miels Portrait

“Applicants find out for which position they have the suitable competencies bring along. ”

Jürgen Muthig
Head of Vocational Training at Fresenius
Jürgen Muthig Fresenius Portrait

“Get to know hidden potential and Develop applicants in a targeted manner. ”

Christian Schütz
HR manager at KU64
Christian Schuetz

Saves time and is a lot of fun doing daily work. ”

Matthias Kühne
Director People & Culture at MCI Germany
Matthias Kühne

Engaging candidate experience through communication on equal terms. ”

Theresa Schröder
Head of HR at Horn & Bauer
Theresa Schröder

“Very solid, scientifically based, innovative even from a candidate's point of view and All in all, simply well thought-out. ”

Dr. Kevin-Lim Jungbauer
Recruiting and HR Diagnostics Expert at Beiersdorf
Kevin Jungbauer
YOUR assistant FOR TALENT ASSESSMENT

Try it for free

Become a HeRo 🦸 and understand candidate fit - even before the first job interview...