Evaluating a training plan means systematically assessing whether training measures have achieved their objectives. The internationally established Kirkpatrick Model provides four evaluation levels for this purpose: reaction, learning, behavior, and results. A structured evaluation is not only relevant for ISO 9001 compliance but also enables the optimization of future training programs and demonstrates the ROI of professional development initiatives.
Definition: What Does "Evaluating a Training Plan" Mean?
Evaluating a training plan encompasses all measures used to systematically assess the effectiveness of professional development activities. Unlike a simple satisfaction survey after training, training evaluation goes much deeper: it examines whether participants have actually learned something, whether they apply what they've learned in their daily work, and whether the training delivers measurable benefits for the organization.
It's important to distinguish between training quality and training effectiveness. A training program can be high-quality in terms of content yet remain ineffective if the knowledge isn't transferred to the workplace. Conversely, an average training session can be highly effective if it closes exactly the knowledge gaps that exist within the team. The evaluation should therefore always consider both dimensions.
Why Is Evaluating Training Programs Important?
ISO 9001 Requirement
The ISO 9001:2015 standard requires in Chapter 7.2 (Competence) that organizations must ensure the necessary competence of their employees. This explicitly includes demonstrating that training measures have been effective. During audits, it is regularly examined how companies document the effectiveness of their professional development activities. A simple attendance certificate is not sufficient.
ROI Demonstration and Budget Justification
Training costs money: seminar fees, travel expenses, lost working time. A systematic evaluation provides the arguments needed to justify training budgets to senior management. Organizations that can demonstrate the Return on Investment (ROI) of their training programs find it easier to secure further investments in personnel development.
Optimization of Personnel Development
Without evaluation, there's no feedback for improvements. Which training formats work in your organization? Which trainers achieve the best results? Where do knowledge gaps persist? The answers to these questions enable data-driven development of the entire training program.
The Kirkpatrick Model: 4 Levels of Evaluation
The Kirkpatrick Model is the most widely used framework for training evaluation worldwide. It was developed in 1959 by American economist Donald Kirkpatrick and distinguishes four sequential evaluation levels.
Level 1: Reaction (Satisfaction)
At the first level, you capture participants' immediate reaction to the training. Typical questions include: How satisfied were the participants? Did they find the content relevant? Was the trainer competent? This level is usually measured directly after the training via feedback forms (often called "smile sheets"). The reaction is important because dissatisfied participants are less motivated to learn. However, satisfaction alone says nothing about actual learning outcomes.
Level 2: Learning (Knowledge Assessment)
The second level measures actual knowledge acquisition. Have participants gained new knowledge, skills, or attitudes? Typical methods include knowledge tests before and after training, practical examinations, or simulations. The comparison shows whether and how much was learned. This level answers the question: What do participants know now that they didn't know before?
Level 3: Behavior (Transfer)
At the third level, it's examined whether participants apply what they've learned in their daily work. This is known as learning transfer. It can be measured through behavioral observation, 360-degree feedback, or discussions with supervisors. The measurement typically occurs 3 to 6 months after training. Level 3 is often the most critical: many training programs fail not at the learning stage but at the transfer stage. The theoretical knowledge is there but isn't applied in practice.
Level 4: Results (Business Impact)
The fourth level asks about concrete impacts on business metrics. Has the training led to measurable improvements? Examples include: reduced error rates, higher productivity, better customer satisfaction, or fewer workplace accidents. This level is the most difficult to measure because many factors besides training influence business results. However, it provides the strongest arguments for the value of professional development.
Methods for Evaluating Training Programs
Using Feedback Forms Effectively
The classic post-training feedback form is quick to create and easy to analyze. To make it meaningful, you should go beyond simple satisfaction queries. Also ask about perceived relevance to daily work, specific implementation intentions, and remaining open questions. Use a consistent scale (for example, 1 to 5) to compare results across different training programs.
Knowledge Tests and Examinations
A pre-training knowledge test and a post-training assessment reveal actual knowledge gains. For external training with certification, the examination is already built in. For internal training, you can use multiple-choice tests, practical exercises, or oral examinations. Important: The test must reflect the actual learning objectives, not detailed knowledge that's irrelevant in practice.
Behavioral Observation and 360-Degree Feedback
For evaluating learning transfer (Level 3), behavioral observations by supervisors, peer feedback from colleagues, or structured development discussions are suitable. A 360-degree feedback several months after training shows whether others perceive a behavioral change. These methods require more effort but deliver the most meaningful insights.
KPIs and ROI Calculation
For the results level (Level 4), you need measurable metrics. Define before the training which KPIs should improve: error rate, throughput time, customer satisfaction, accident numbers. Compare the values before and after training. The ROI is calculated using the formula: ROI = (Benefit – Cost) / Cost × 100. A training with an ROI of 150 percent means that every dollar invested generated $1.50 in benefits.
Evaluating Training Plans: Step-by-Step
- Before training: Define clear, measurable learning objectives. Determine which metrics should improve. Conduct a pre-training knowledge test if needed.
- Immediately after training: Capture participant satisfaction (Level 1). Conduct a final assessment (Level 2). Ask about specific implementation intentions.
- 3 to 6 months after training: Check learning transfer through discussions, observation, or feedback (Level 3). Compare relevant performance metrics (Level 4).
- Documentation: Record all results in writing. ISO 9001 requires documented information about measures taken and their effectiveness.
- Optimization: Derive improvements for future training from the findings. Adjust content, formats, or trainers as needed.
Common Mistakes in Training Evaluation
Only measuring satisfaction: Many organizations limit themselves to Level 1 (feedback forms). However, satisfaction correlates only weakly with actual learning success. A popular training can still be ineffective.
No before-and-after comparisons: Without a baseline, you don't know how much the training actually contributed. Measure the starting point before evaluating success.
Measuring success too early: Learning transfer (Level 3) only becomes apparent after weeks or months. Those who expect results immediately after training are measuring the wrong thing.
No consequences: Evaluation without consequences is a waste of time. Use the insights to improve training, change providers, or build in transfer support.
Unrealistic ROI expectations: Not every training can be quantified in monetary terms. Soft skills training often has indirect and long-term effects. Accept that some impacts are difficult to measure.
Frequently Asked Questions About Evaluating Training Plans
What does "evaluating a training plan" mean?
It refers to the systematic assessment of whether professional development measures have achieved their objectives. The evaluation encompasses participant satisfaction, learning success, behavioral change, and business results. It serves quality assurance and optimization of future training programs.
What are the 4 levels of the Kirkpatrick Model?
The model distinguishes Level 1 (Reaction: participant satisfaction), Level 2 (Learning: knowledge acquisition), Level 3 (Behavior: application in daily work), and Level 4 (Results: impact on organizational objectives). Each level builds on the previous one.
What does ISO 9001 require for training evaluation?
ISO 9001:2015 requires in Chapter 7.2 that organizations ensure the competence of their employees. This includes demonstrating that training has been effective. Simple attendance certificates are not sufficient. Effectiveness must be documented.
How do you measure learning transfer?
Learning transfer can be measured through behavioral observation, 360-degree feedback, or discussions with supervisors. The measurement typically occurs 3 to 6 months after training. Comparing performance metrics before and after training also provides insights.
How do you calculate the ROI of training?
The formula is: ROI = (Benefit – Cost) / Cost × 100. Benefits include productivity increases, error reduction, or time savings. Costs include training fees, lost working time, and materials. The challenge lies in quantifying the benefits.
When should you evaluate training?
Participant satisfaction (Level 1) is captured immediately after training. Knowledge tests (Level 2) are conducted at the end of the training. Learning transfer (Level 3) is assessed after 3 to 6 months. Business results (Level 4) often only become apparent after 6 to 12 months.
Which KPIs are suitable for training evaluation?
Depending on the training topic, various metrics can be relevant: error rate, productivity, customer satisfaction, accident numbers, throughput time, or employee turnover. Define before training which KPIs should improve, and measure them before and after.
Conclusion
Systematically evaluating training plans is more than an ISO compliance exercise. It provides the foundation for data-driven personnel development and helps deploy training budgets in a targeted manner. The Kirkpatrick Model offers a proven framework with its four levels to go beyond simple satisfaction measurement. The key is to define clear objectives before training and to understand evaluation as a continuous process.
Looking to identify the right talent already during recruitment? Discover how objective aptitude diagnostics can help you find suitable candidates. Learn more about Aivy
Sources
- Kirkpatrick, D.L. (1959/60). Techniques for evaluating training programs. Journal of the American Society of Training Directors, 13/14.
- Kirkpatrick, J. & Kirkpatrick, W. (2016). Four Levels of Training Evaluation. Berrett-Koehler Publishers. ISBN: 978-1-62656-613-3
- ISO 9001:2015 – Quality management systems – Requirements. International Organization for Standardization. Chapter 7.2 Competence. https://www.iso.org/standard/62085.html
- Phillips, J. & Phillips, P.P. (2016). Handbook of Training Evaluation and Measurement Methods. Routledge.
- ATD (Association for Talent Development). Evaluating Learning: Getting to Measurements That Matter. https://www.td.org
Make a better pre-selection — even before the first interview
In just a few minutes, Aivy shows you which candidates really fit the role. Beyond resumes based on strengths.
